Comparative uprisings: understanding contemporary mass social unrest

Period of duration of course
‌‌
Course info
Number of course hours
20
Number of hours of lecturers of reference
20
CFU 3
‌‌

Modalità esame

Students’ presentations in class (50%), class attendance and participation (50%).

Note modalità di esame

Students in the PhD program are evaluated on an approved/rejected basis, while students in the master’s program are evaluated on a 0-30 scale.


Prerequisiti

No particular requirements, except being at least student of a Master programme, or enrolled in the doctoral programme.

Programma

Episodes of massive social unrest, also called uprisings, popular revolts, and rebellions, are recurrent and increasingly frequent events in contemporary societies. The phenomenon can be seen in consolidated, advanced democracies of the global north, as well as in younger democracies and developing economies of the global south. Quantitative studies have shown an increase in the frequency of major protests on a global scale, in recent decades (Carothers & Wong, 2020; Carothers & Youngs, 2015). A study of the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (FES) and the Initiative for Policy Dialogue concluded that we are living through a period in history similar to the years around 1848, 1917 or 1968 “when large numbers of people rebelled against the way things were, demanding change” (Ortiz et al., 2021, p. 13). Examples of massive social unrest include the gilets jaunes in France (2018), the indignados movement in Spain (2011), and the anti-corruption protests in Romania (2018), and the so-called ‘social outbreaks’ in Chile (2019), Perú and Colombia (2019-2020). In the Arab region, there was the wave of uprisings at the beginning of the previous decade, known as the Arab Spring, as well as the revolt in Lebanon in 2019. This course uses the emerging literature exploring the causes, dynamics, actors and outcomes of these episodes, and tracks the theoretical debates and models that have been used to understand them.

In this course, we explore some controversies crossing the fields of social movements studies, comparative politics, peace studies and revolutions scholarship. Significant attention is paid to debates on the defining properties of various forms of massive unrest, as well as to their differences: refolutions, coupvolutions, uprisings, revolutions, riots, revolts, among others. In this course, we focus on a “grey area” in the literature, where episodes of unrest do not seem to fit neatly into any of the big conceptual categories traditionally used in the disciplinary fields mentioned above. In addition, a focus on episodes of massive social unrest gives a vantage point to examine the connections between radical change and mass social unrest. It is known that a major assumption of contentious politics studies is that mobilizations from below produce change, promote democracy and advance the cause of equality. In this course, we examine this assumption in light of scholarly literature. Similarly, the social movements literature has long debated whether peaceful protests or disruptive and violent movements are more effective in bringing about social change (Chenoweth & Schock, 2015; Gamson, 1975; Fox Piven 2016). In studying mass social unrest across various regions, the course engages in debates about different temporalities (timing, tempo, acceleration), the role of spontaneity, coalition building, authoritarian backslash, democratic erosion, state building, legitimacy, among other issues.

An innovative aspect of this course is its transnational scope, as we study episodes of mass unrest that have occurred in the Latin American region, Europe, and the Middle East and North African region –and their respective literatures.


Obiettivi formativi

After taking this course, students will be able to:

  • Understand the contexts, causes, dynamics, and implications of episodes of mass social unrest across various geographies (Europe, North America, Middle East, etc.).
  • Familiarize themselves with the main authors, topics, and debates among scholars of revolutions and uprisings.
  • Identify similarities and differences between Europe, Latin America, and the Middle East, and within these geographical areas, in terms of the main characteristics of episodes of mass social unrest.
  • Distinguish between various forms of mass social unrest, particularly between revolutions, uprisings, revolts, and social movements.
  • Use the concepts and authors discussed in the course creatively and originally for their own research purposes.


Riferimenti bibliografici

Tilly, C. (2003). The Politics of Collective Violence. Cambridge University Press.

Rudé, G. F. E. (1981). The Crowd in History: A Study of Popular Disturbances in France and England, 1730-1848. Lawrence and Wishart

Hobsbawm, Eric. Primitive Rebels: Studies in Archaic Forms of Social Movement in the 19th and 20th Centuries. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press, 1978.

Abrams, B. (2019). A Fifth Generation of Revolutionary Theory is Yet to Come. Journal of Historical Sociology, 32(3), 378–386. https://doi.org/10.1111/johs.12248

**Beck, C. J., & Ritter, D. P. (2021). Thinking Beyond Generations: On the Future of Revolution Theory. Journal of Historical Sociology, 34(1), 134–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/johs.12315

Goldstone, J. A. (2001). Toward a Fourth Generation of Revolutionary Theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 4(1), 139–187. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.4.1.139

**Goldstone, J. A. (2024). The Generations of Revolutionary Theory Revisited: New Works and the Evolution of Theory. Critical Sociology, 50(6), 1069–1086. https://doi.org/10.1177/08969205241241802

**Lawson, G. (2016). Within and Beyond the “Fourth Generation” of Revolutionary Theory. Sociological Theory, 34(2), 106–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275116649221

Gerbaudo, P. (2017). The Mask and the Flag: Populism, Citizenism, and Global Protest. Oxford University Press.

**Bayat, A. (2021). The Arab Spring and Revolutionary Theory: An Intervention in a Debate. Journal of Historical Sociology, 34(2), 393–400. https://doi.org/10.1002/johs.12334

Lawson, G. (Ed.). (2019). Revolutionary Situations: England and Chile. In Anatomies of Revolution (pp. 97–123). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108697385.005

Bayat, A. (2021). Revolutionary Life: The Everyday of the Arab Spring. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv23dx2s0

**Garton Ash, T. (2009). Lessons From a Revolution. Index on Censorship, 38(3), 54–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/03064220903170406

**Auyero, J. (2006). The Political Makings of the 2001 Lootings in Argentina. Journal of Latin American Studies, 38(2), 241–265. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X06000708

Auyero, J. (2003). Relational riot: Austerity and corruption protest in the neoliberal era. Social Movement Studies, 2(2), 117–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/1474283032000139742

**Chenoweth, E. (2020). The future of nonviolent resistance. Journal of Democracy, 31(3), 69–84.

Chenoweth, E., & Stephan, M. J. (2011). Why civil resistance works: The strategic logic of nonviolent conflict. Columbia University Press.